Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hi5teria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. While the arguments for deletion are convincing, coverage in Tempo and the fact that there is material available in Indonesian, I would like to give it the benefit of the doubt. If the fact about the Maya awards can't be verified and doubt persist about its notability, it can certainly be nominated again. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 19:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi5teria

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film. Fails WP:NFILM. Sources mentioned are not independent. ronaz ^Talk! 09:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note IP 111.94.115.22 removed the AfD template twice.ronaz ^Talk! 14:31, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Can't find any substantial coverage of it online in WP:RS, English or Indonesian. Can't find any evidence online that it won the claimed Maya award. Just reviews on film blogs. Fails WP:NFILM. Wikishovel (talk) 19:39, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep simply by virtue of the very large number of known notable actors with en.wp articles taking part. I haven't hunted for the Maya award, but then there's so much material in Indonesian. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It looks like someone improved the previously sketchy sourcing. While I still have my doubts about the blog post in Viva, the coverage in Republika and Tempo seems to satisfy WP:GNG. --HyperGaruda (talk) 04:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.